Thursday, June 26, 2008

Pension controversy will outlive reform session

When Warren Rogers started a retirement plan for his employees more than thirty years ago, he never seriously considered offering a defined benefit program like Kentucky provides state and local government workers.

“Those plans are built on an assumption that growth never ends,” Rogers, president of W. Rogers Company in Lexington, said.

Defined-benefit plans offer employees retirement pay based on years of service. As costs rise over time, any expenses not paid by investment gains become the responsibility of the employer. On the other hand, defined contributions pre-fund an investment account with employee and employer contributions. The employee is then responsible for investment gains or losses in the account.

Public-employee fringe benefits are at the heart of an odd controversy during the Kentucky General Assembly’s special session, which began Monday. Despite nearly unanimous floor votes for a reform package of Kentucky’s generous health and pension plans this week, wide divisions persist on what needs to come next for the government offerings. The state is languishing under a nearly $30-billion shortfall in its public employee benefit accounts.

While House Bill 1 makes some changes to benefits for newly hired state and local employees after September 1, it depends heavily on new dollars from the state‘s General Fund and merely slows the growth rate of the huge shortfall. The new anticipated contributions haven’t received much public discussion mostly because no one knows how high the numbers will go.

In a floor speech Monday, House Speaker Jody Richards tried to sound hopeful.
He said “the structural changes we are making will prevent the system from going bankrupt provided that future legislators have the will to fund the system at an actuarially acceptable level as statutorily required by this legislation.” Then he added that “investment performance will need to be improved.”

All that means if increasingly higher amounts of money are poured into public retirement funds each year, health-care costs don’t get too far out of control and investment returns improve, the benefits system may not become insolvent. Insolvency would necessitate putting in even more taxpayer dollars.

Rogers is skeptical about the legislators‘ plan.

“That’s crazy,” he said. “That’s no reform at all. Uncertainty like that would run my company out of business. Frankly, a well-funded defined contribution plan properly invested can provide much more retirement benefit to an employee than a company pension. There is a reason that virtually the entire private sector has converted to defined contribution plans and the public sector remains mired in the past.”

Indeed, House Bill 1 specifies required contributions from taxpayers into the benefits accounts for the next two decades, starting at 44 percent of the full funding amount in 2011 and increasing 4 percentage points a year until reaching 100 percent in 2025. Mandating taxpayer contributions is a first for Kentucky, which has fallen far short of making such payments for the last quarter of a century.

But Rep. Bill Farmer, R-Lexington, said future General Assemblies will be free to ignore what really amounts to a funding suggestion. Farmer sees an ulterior motive in the hesitancy to address exploding health-care spending for government employees.
“If they decide not to make those payments in a future General Assembly, they just won’t make them and there is nothing anyone can do about it,” Farmer said. “I think (House leaders) are counting on the federal government to take over the health-care system sooner rather than later and then those benefits won’t be their problem anymore.”

Rep. Bob Damron, D-Nicholasville, questioned where the extra money will come from for Kentucky to catch up with escalating expenses for existing employees and retirees.

“Are we going to cut back on spending or raise taxes or both?” he said. “I don’t know.”

Senate President David Williams, R-Burkesville, has been sounding the alarm for public-employee benefits reform for years.

“If we don’t change the benefits package to match what is available in the private sector, taxpayers will be paying for benefits none of them could ever afford,” Williams said. “(The funding deficit) will cause a huge decrease in services or a huge increase in taxes.”

He also charged House leaders with having already mapped out a plan to pay for benefits with new tax dollars.

“Obviously, they want to increase taxes,” he said.

That sentiment concerns Kathy Gornik, president of Thiel Audio in Lexington, who sees the issue as one of fairness that puts at risk Kentucky companies‘ ability to compete.

“As a business owner who struggles to earn a profit, I find it unconscionable that the Kentucky state Legislature is jeopardizing Kentucky's financial and economic future by continuing to borrow money and raise taxes to fund the unsustainable state employee pension plan,” Gornik said. “I don't see why state workers should have better benefits than those workers who are creating the wealth that makes their very existence possible.”

President Williams expressed optimism that Kentuckians will ultimately realize the problems caused by offering “unsustainable” benefits. He predicted that every state will move toward more viable defined contribution plans because employers can “pre-fund” their portion of the benefit and then it becomes the employee’s responsibility.

Mark Wilden, a vice president at Merrill Lynch in Lexington, said the sooner Kentucky makes that change, the better it will be because of how rapidly the costs are increasing.

“They don’t have a choice but to switch over,” Wilden said. “Most of these defined benefit plans have fallen apart.”

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

“I don't see why state workers should have better benefits than those workers who are creating the wealth that makes their very existence possible.”

This is the most important line of the whole discussion. Thank you for this outstanding post!

Kevin said...

To answer Ms. Gornik, the reason we merit employees need better benefits is to offset the much lower pay that we receive in the public sector. I can go to a private company and earn nearly 50% more than I am now. That extra bump could make up for my reliance on a 401(k) style retirement, which really isn't as lucrative as it gets made out to be. I see first-hand that it takes more than the average family can afford these days to fully fund retirement through a 401(k) plan.

Anonymous said...

Good day !.
You re, I guess , perhaps very interested to know how one can manage to receive high yields .
There is no initial capital needed You may commense to get income with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
The firm incorporates an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

Its head office is in Panama with structures everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
Do you want to become an affluent person?
That`s your chance That`s what you really need!

I`m happy and lucky, I started to get real money with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to choose a correct partner utilizes your funds in a right way - that`s AimTrust!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and what I started with was a funny sum of 500 bucks!
It`s easy to start , just click this link http://iqedimugim.lookseekpages.com/romuli.html
and go! Let`s take this option together to get rid of nastiness of the life

Anonymous said...

Hi !.
You may , perhaps very interested to know how one can make real money .
There is no need to invest much at first. You may start earning with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you need
The firm incorporates an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

It is based in Panama with structures everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
Do you want to become a happy investor?
That`s your choice That`s what you wish in the long run!

I feel good, I began to take up real money with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to select a correct companion who uses your savings in a right way - that`s AimTrust!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and my first deposit was 1 grand only!
It`s easy to get involved , just click this link http://yqakisusuw.uvoweb.net/xexemi.html
and lucky you`re! Let`s take our chance together to become rich

Anonymous said...

Hello!
You may probably be very curious to know how one can make real money on investments.
There is no need to invest much at first.
You may commense to get income with a money that usually is spent
for daily food, that's 20-100 dollars.
I have been participating in one company's work for several years,
and I'm ready to let you know my secrets at my blog.

Please visit my pages and send me private message to get the info.

P.S. I earn 1000-2000 per daily now.

http://theinvestblog.com [url=http://theinvestblog.com]Online Investment Blog[/url]

Anonymous said...

Glad to materialize here. Good day or night everybody!

We are not acquainted yet? It’s easy to fix,
my name is Peter.
Generally I’m a venturesome gambler. recently I take a great interest in online-casino and poker.
Not long time ago I started my own blog, where I describe my virtual adventures.
Probably, it will be interesting for you to utilize special software facilitating winnings .
Please visit my web site. http://allbestcasino.com I’ll be interested on your opinion..

Anonymous said...

Good day!

For sure you didn’t here about me yet,
friends call me Peter.
Generally I’m a venturesome gambler. for a long time I’m keen on online-casino and poker.
Not long time ago I started my own blog, where I describe my virtual adventures.
Probably, it will be interesting for you to find out about my progress.
Please visit my diary. http://allbestcasino.com I’ll be glad would you find time to leave your opinion.